C3 Metals Inc.
Canadian TSXV-listed copper-gold explorer focused on Peru (Jasperoide, Khaleesi, 50%-owned Super Block) and Jamaica. It is well funded after a C$28.0M bought deal in February 2026 but has no economic study, mine plan or production.
Report of 6 Oct 2026 (latest), confidence low
- Listing
- TSXV: CCCM
- Main project
- Jasper
- Location
- San Juan Province, Argentina
- Commodities
- Copper, Gold
- Stage
- Exploration
- Tier
- Tier 3
- Website
- www.c3metals.com
There is no high-urgency trigger and the company is well funded. However, fresh capital is being deployed across multiple drilling programmes as FY2027 budgets are set, which is a medium-urgency window for a small productivity, data-governance and community offer.
The Explorer playbook applies: C3 has a resource but no study, plant or production.
The scope is kept small and practical:
- community engagement and permitting readiness in Peru;
- drill and assay data governance;
- early operability input (mine scheduling, drill & blast and load & haul assumptions) for an eventual Jasperoide PEA.
Because C3 is running multiple funded drilling programmes, we add a light drilling-productivity and contractor-management module. It borrows our SIC and 24-hour planning tools and is framed as runway extension.
Fees are mostly equity (60%), with the cash limited to a fixed-fee diagnostic and a site-cost retainer. Total ticket is US$140k, below our usual range, consistent with 'keep it small'.
Company summary
C3 Metals Inc. (TSXV: CCCM) is a Canadian junior exploration company focused on copper and gold. The brief describes its main project as 'Jasper' in Argentina. The research does not support that: the company's filings consistently place its principal asset, the Jasperoide copper-gold skarn/porphyry project, in southern Peru's Andahuaylas–Yauri belt [2][6][11][12]. The financial statements describe Jasperoide as 64 concessions covering about 31,280 ha, held mostly 100% plus an option over additional concessions [6][12]. The company website cites 26,800 ha [8]. Jasperoide's IFRS carrying value was C$38.39M at May 31, 2026 [2].
Fiscal 2026 materials cite a near-surface Measured and Indicated resource of 51.9 Mt at 0.50% total Cu [2]. A maiden-resource release from May 2023 also exists [48]. Even so, the company states it 'has not determined whether its properties contain mineral resources that are economically recoverable' [6]. No PEA, PFS, FS, mine plan, recovery testwork dataset, infrastructure study or permitting schedule was identified.
Corporate activity has broadened beyond Jasperoide. The company reported drilling at the Khaleesi project in Peru, including 269 m at 0.30% Cu in December 2025, and exploration is restarting in Jamaica [31]. The C$28.0M February 2026 bought deal (25,455,000 shares at C$1.10, Paradigm Capital lead) was earmarked for Khaleesi and the 50%-owned Super Block project plus general corporate purposes [41].
Financially, C3 had C$30.84M cash and C$30.06M working capital at February 28, 2026 [3], and no identified debt [14]. Third-party analysis estimates burn at about C$10M/yr, implying roughly three years of runway [14]. Losses are modest: the Q3 FY2026 net loss was C$0.919M and the nine-month loss C$2.52M [45]. The company remains dependent on equity financing [6][11]. Its 2024 audited statements carried a going-concern material uncertainty [27].
Key projects
4| Project | Location | Stage | Resource or reserve |
|---|---|---|---|
Jasperoide Copper-gold (skarn and porphyry) | Southern Peru, Andahuaylas–Yauri porphyry-skarn belt (NOT Argentina as per the brief) | Exploration / resource stage; no PEA/PFS/FS | 51.9 Mt M&I at 0.50% total Cu, near-surface (cited in FY2026 materials [2]; NI 43-101 assumed for a TSXV issuer; project attribution and full report to be confirmed). No reserves. 64 concessions, about 31,280 ha per financial statements [6][12] vs 26,800 ha on website [8]. Carrying value C$38.39M at May 31, 2026 [2]. C$2.441M capitalised in Q1 FY2026, covering drilling, permitting, environmental, community and social development, and H&S [16]. |
Khaleesi Copper-gold | Peru | Exploration drilling | None disclosed December 2025 intercept of 269 m at 0.30% Cu [31]. Primary use of proceeds of the C$28.0M Feb 2026 bought deal [41]. |
Super Block (50%-owned) Copper-gold | Not stated in research | Exploration | None disclosed Named in use of proceeds of the Feb 2026 financing [41]. JV partner not identified. |
Jamaica exploration Copper-gold | Jamaica | Exploration restarting | None disclosed Exploration restarting per [31]. The peers section ambiguously links the 51.9 Mt resource to a 'Jamaica/Argentina portfolio level'; this needs verification. |
Issues
Most severe first- HighTechnical
No economic study: 51.9 Mt resource with no defined path to PEA operability assumptions
There is a reported M&I resource but no PEA/PFS/FS, mining method, strip ratio, throughput, cost or recovery basis. Value therefore depends entirely on the market believing in an eventual study. When a PEA comes, its mining, drill & blast, load & haul and owner-vs-contractor assumptions will set the first cost-curve position investors see.
- MediumManagementAnalyst inference
Capital and attention spread across four fronts (Jasperoide, Khaleesi, 50% Super Block, Jamaica)
The February 2026 raise was directed to Khaleesi and Super Block, not the resource-stage Jasperoide asset. Jamaica is also restarting. Running several remote drilling programmes in two countries with a junior team increases contractor, logistics and field-cost-control risk. It also risks Jasperoide's milestones stalling.
- MediumOperationalAnalyst inference
Exploration spend productivity at scale (drilling metres, standby, assay turnaround) not visible
With about C$10M/yr burn, around C$6.6M of it in field/E&E spend (estimate), drilling contractor productivity and logistics are the main controllable cost. Acceleration can raise burn sharply, and no productivity KPIs are disclosed.
- MediumTechnicalAnalyst inference
Metallurgical recovery unproven; 75% resource assumption sits below Andean peer studies
The resource constraint reportedly uses 75% Cu recovery, against 79–91% in peer studies. Skarn/porphyry metallurgy is unconfirmed, and no testwork dataset was identified.
- MediumFunding
Equity-funding dependence and dilution; prior going-concern flag
The company has no cash flow. Runway is about 3 years at the current burn, but it shortens with acceleration. The next raise's pricing will depend on drilling results and milestones.
- MediumEsg CommunityAnalyst inference
Social licence and permitting in Peru: no disclosed agreements or programme KPIs
Peruvian copper projects routinely face community-access and permitting delays. C3 spends on community and social development but discloses no agreements, grievance data or permitting schedule. No adverse event was found, but the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Evidence and 1 source
Q1 FY2026 capitalised costs include community and social development, permitting and environmental [16]. No permitting schedule identified. No verified community events found.
- LowOtherAnalyst inference
Disclosure and data inconsistencies (hectares, cash comparatives, management slate)
Inconsistent public data points to weak data governance around technical and corporate information. This matters ahead of a NI 43-101 study, where drill and assay data integrity is audited.
Financial position
Statements as of Cash at February 28, 2026 (Q2 FY2026 FS) [3]; P&L to May 31, 2026 (Q3 FY2026) [2][45]- Market cap
- —
- Cash
- $22.4M
- Debt
- $0
- Quarterly burn
- $1.8M
- Runway
- 36 months
- Going concern
- Not flagged
Not available. 25,455,000 shares were issued in the Feb 2026 bought deal at C$1.10 [32][41]. Basic and fully diluted counts must be taken from SEDAR+.
Bought-deal private placement for C$28.0005M gross (about US$20.3M), including over-allotment. Terms: 25,455,000 shares at C$1.10, Paradigm Capital lead, 6% cash commission. Announced Jan 21, 2026, upsized Jan 22, closed around Feb 12, 2026; hold period ended June 12, 2026 [2][32][41].
Cash rose from C$11.851M (Aug 31, 2025) [11] to C$30.839M at Feb 28, 2026 after the raise [3].
- **Data conflict:** the Q2 statements show C$3.408M at Aug 31, 2025, so the two comparatives need reconciling.
- **May 31, 2026 cash:** the Q3 excerpt shows only US$-denominated cash of US$1.527M (C$2.106M). It is not total cash and should not be read as depletion [2].
- **Burn and runway:** burn is about C$10M/yr (third-party estimate [14]), or about US$1.81M/quarter, which gave about 36 months of runway at Feb 2026. Assuming the burn is unchanged, about 28 months remain from today.
- **Losses are small:** Q3 net loss was C$0.919M and the nine-month loss C$2.52M [45], because exploration is capitalised.
- **Debt:** none identified [14].
- **Going concern:** the 2024 audit flagged a material uncertainty [27]. The FY2025 audit was signed Dec 11, 2025 [25]. A current going-concern qualification is not confirmed, so the flag is set to false pending the audit report.
- **Funding dependence:** clearly disclosed [6][11].
Company reports in CAD. Converted at 0.725 USD/CAD, the rate implied by the company's own May 31, 2026 disclosure (US$1.527M = C$2.106M) [2]. Market cap is unknown because there is no reliable current share price or share count; the C$0.63 quote [8] comes from a February 2025 snapshot and is stale.
Share price
No market data was found for this listing.
Peer benchmark
Unknown quartile on costJasperoide cannot be placed on a cost curve because it has no mine plan, recovery basis or cost study.
On grade, its 0.50% Cu resource is in line with Los Chapitos (0.49%) and within Santo Domingo's 0.39–0.59% early-years range.
On recovery, the 75% resource-constraint assumption trails the peer studies (78.8–91.5%). On strip ratio, the 'potential low strip' claim is unquantified against peers at 1.30–2.33:1.
Credible early operability and metallurgy work is what will eventually establish its quartile.
| Company | Production | AISC US$ | Head grade | Recovery | Strip | Market cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Los Andes Copper – Vizcachitas (Chile) | Pre-production; PFS plan of 49.64 Mt/y ore (Feb 2023) | 2.13 | Not available in extract | 91.1% | 2.33 | — |
C3 Metals – Jasperoide (Peru) CCCM (this company) | None (exploration/resource stage) | — | Resource 0.50% total Cu (51.9 Mt M&I); no mine-plan head grade | — | — | — |
Alta Copper – Cañariaco Norte (Peru) | Pre-production (Aug 2024 presentation) | — | Not available in extract | 89.2% | 1.3 | — |
Capstone Copper – Santo Domingo (Chile) | Development; FS Sept 2024 | — | 0.39–0.59% Cu (first 7 years) | 91.3% | — | — |
Camino Corp – Los Chapitos (Peru) | Pre-production (Dec 2025 presentation) | — | 0.49% Cu mill feed | 78.8% | 1.56 | — |
McEwen Mining – Los Azules (Argentina) | Development-stage copper project | — | Not available | — | — | — |
Andean copper projects with study-stage technical parameters (PFS/FS/company presentations, Feb 2023 – Dec 2025). None is in production, so figures are study assumptions, not operating results. C3 has no study, so its row shows resource data only.
Filings
7| Date | Type | Filing and takeaway | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-24 | Interim MD&A / FS (Q3 FY2026) | MD&A for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2026 Jasperoide carrying value C$38.39M. US$ cash US$1.527M (partial cash line only). Cites 51.9 Mt M&I at 0.50% Cu. Q3 net loss C$0.919M; nine-month loss C$2.52M. | [2] |
| 2026-04 | Interim FS (Q2 FY2026) | Unaudited condensed consolidated interim FS, six months ended Feb 28, 2026 Cash C$30.839M and working capital C$30.064M after the bought deal. | [3] |
| 2026-01 | Interim MD&A (Q1 FY2026) | MD&A for the three months ended Nov 30, 2025 Cash C$8.427M. C$2.441M capitalised to Jasperoide, including community/social, permitting and environmental spend. Liquidity depends on cash plus equity financings. | [6] |
| 2025-12-11 | Annual FS & MD&A (FY2025) | Consolidated FS and MD&A, year ended Aug 31, 2025 Cash C$11.851M. FY2025 net loss C$2.90M. About C$2.50M capitalised E&E. Additional funding required for FY2026. Audit signed by Krista Ryan. | [11] |
| 2024-12 | Annual FS (FY2024) | Consolidated FS, year ended Aug 31, 2024 Unmodified opinion with a material uncertainty related to going concern. | [27] |
| 2026-03-23 | Corporate presentation | Corporate Presentation March 2026 Identifies Dan Symons as President, CEO and director and Tony Manini as Chairman. | [13] |
| 2023-05-23 | News release (resource) | C3 Metals Reports Maiden Resource Source of the maiden resource. Underlying NI 43-101 details were not retrieved. | [48] |
Value at stake
Estimates from public data, validated in the diagnosticEstimated first-year value at stake is about US$0.96M. It comes mainly from field productivity (US$0.48M), delay avoidance (US$0.33M) and data-rework avoidance (US$0.14M).
A further benefit is not counted: Jasperoide PEA assumptions that will hold up when tested, which shapes how the market values the project once a study is published.
The proposed fee of US$140k is 14.6% of first-year value, at the top of our 10–15% band. That reflects low-confidence inputs; 35% of the fee is at risk.
At about C$10M/yr burn, the productivity lever alone adds roughly 0.8 months of runway per year.
| Lever | How it is calculated | US$ / year | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
Field/drilling cost productivity +10% Drill metres per shift, standby and downtime, contractor terms, mobilisation and logistics across Khaleesi, Super Block and Jamaica | Field/E&E spend ≈ total burn C$10.0M/yr [14] − annualised expensed loss (C$2.52M × 4/3 = C$3.36M) [45] = C$6.64M/yr. × 10% = C$0.664M × 0.725 = US$0.481M/yr (estimate). | $481K | Low |
Avoided drilling-programme delay (community/permitting) Structured community engagement, grievance closure and a permitting critical-path tracker to keep drill access | One quarter of corporate overhead incurred without field progress ≈ Q3 FY2026 net loss C$0.919M [45]. × 50% assumed reduction in delay probability = C$0.460M × 0.725 = US$0.333M/yr (estimate). | $333K | Low |
Data rework avoided (re-assay / re-logging / twin holes at study stage) Drill and assay data governance, QA/QC protocol and database validation | C$6.64M/yr field spend (as above) × 3% assumed rework avoided = C$0.199M × 0.725 = US$0.144M/yr (estimate). | $144K | Low |
Proposal
Making the C$28M work harder in the field and getting Jasperoide study-ready: a small, equity-weighted operability and social-licence programme
C3 Metals closed a C$28.0M bought deal in February 2026 and is now drilling across Khaleesi, the 50%-owned Super Block and Jamaica. Jasperoide meanwhile carries a 51.9 Mt M&I resource at 0.50% Cu and C$38.39M of capitalised spend with no economic study [2][31][41].
At about C$10M/yr burn [14], field productivity and contractor control are the main levers on runway, and with it on the price and timing of the next raise. We propose a deliberately small engagement in two phases:
- **Phase 1:** a 4-week fixed-fee diagnostic of drilling productivity, the assay and data chain, and community engagement.
- **Phase 2:** a 3-month implementation of daily drilling KPI control, data governance, a community-engagement framework and early operability inputs for a future Jasperoide PEA.
We estimate value at stake at about US$0.96M/yr. The total fee is US$140k (about 14.6% of that), 40% cash and 60% equity, with 35% of the fee vesting only on agreed KPIs.
Problems we solve
- Exploration spend productivity at scale across four fronts (drill metres per shift, standby, mobilisation, assay turnaround).
- Capital and attention spread across Jasperoide, Khaleesi, Super Block and Jamaica.
- No economic study: Jasperoide needs credible mining and cost assumptions before a PEA.
- Social licence and permitting continuity in Peru.
- Drill and assay data governance, plus inconsistent public data ahead of NI 43-101 work.
- Equity-funding dependence: stretching runway to improve terms of the next raise.
Scope of work
5 workstreams| Workstream | What we do | Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 – Field productivity & readiness diagnostic | On-site in Peru plus a desk review of drilling contracts and daily drill reports. We baseline:
Output: quantified improvement plan and KPI baselines. | Weeks 1–4 |
| Phase 2a – Drilling short-interval control & contractor management | Adapt our SIC and 24-hour planning approach to exploration drilling: daily metres and downtime tracking, a contractor scorecard and contract levers (standby rates, productivity incentives), and consumables and logistics planning across sites. | Months 2–4 |
| Phase 2b – Drill & assay data governance | Database validation rules, QA/QC protocol (standards, blanks, duplicates), chain of custody and a dashboard. Aim: data that is study-ready for an independent QP and consistent across corporate disclosures. | Months 2–4 |
| Phase 2c – Community engagement & permitting readiness (Peru) | Stakeholder map, engagement calendar, grievance mechanism with closure KPIs, local hiring and procurement plan, and a permitting critical-path tracker for drill access. | Months 2–4 |
| Phase 2d – Early operability input to Jasperoide PEA | Ex-operator review of the mining method and strip-ratio assumptions, drill & blast and load & haul cost basis, owner-vs-contractor framing, and a first-pass mine schedule logic. Also flag metallurgical testwork priorities: the 75% recovery assumption sits below the 79–91% range in peer studies. | Months 3–4 |
Commercial terms
$140KUS$56,000 cash in total: US$40,000 fixed-fee diagnostic (50% at mobilisation, 50% at report) plus a US$16,000 implementation retainer covering travel and site costs, paid monthly over 3 months.
US$84,000 in C3 Metals common shares (or stock options under the company's security-based compensation plan), in three tranches:
- **US$35,000** on adoption of the implementation plan and data-governance protocol;
- **US$24,500** on achieving the drilling-productivity KPI;
- **US$24,500** on achieving the cost-per-metre and data-quality KPIs.
Each tranche is priced at no less than the TSXV Discounted Market Price at issuance (the last financing reference is C$1.10). All issuances are subject to TSXV acceptance.
Explorer playbook: small scope, equity-weighted. C3 holds about C$30.8M cash [3], so a modest cash diagnostic is easily affordable. 35% of the total fee (the two KPI tranches) is at risk. Equity is subject to TSXV acceptance and a 4-month hold. No lenders were identified, but consents under any JV or option agreements should be checked.
Results-linked fees
35% of the fee depends on resultsTotal fee is US$140k: US$56k cash (40%) and US$84k equity (60%).
- **Phase 1:** US$40k fixed-fee cash diagnostic.
- **Phase 2:** US$16k cash retainer plus three equity tranches.
- **At risk:** two KPI-linked tranches totalling US$49k (35% of the fee) vest only on measured improvements against diagnostic baselines, covering drilling productivity, cost per metre and data quality.
This is consistent with proposal.commercial_terms.
| Phase | Duration | Fee | Paid in | Paid or vests when |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 – Diagnostic (fixed fee) | 4 weeks | $40K | Cash | 50% on signing/mobilisation, 50% on delivery of the diagnostic report with KPI baselines |
| Phase 2 – Implementation retainer (site/travel costs) | 3 months | $16K | Cash | Monthly in arrears during implementation |
| Equity tranche 1 – Plan adoption | End of month 2 | $35K | Equity | Management adopts the implementation plan, the data-governance protocol and the community-engagement framework; TSXV acceptance obtained |
| Equity tranche 2 – Drilling productivity KPI (at risk) | End of month 4 | $25K | Equity | Metres per drill-shift +10% vs the diagnostic baseline over a 6-week measurement window |
| Equity tranche 3 – Cost and data KPIs (at risk) | End of month 4 | $25K | Equity | All-in field cost per metre −8% vs baseline AND QA/QC insertion and pass rate ≥95% with a validated database |
| KPI | Baseline | Target | Measured by |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metres drilled per drill-shift (all active rigs) Linked to fee | To be measured in diagnostic weeks 1–4 from contractor daily drill reports (not publicly disclosed) | +10% vs baseline | Contractor daily reports reconciled to the company drill database; 6-week rolling average |
| All-in field cost per metre drilled Linked to fee | Diagnostic baseline. Context: field/E&E spend about C$6.64M/yr (estimate from [14][45]) | −8% vs baseline | Invoices and capitalised E&E ledger divided by metres drilled, monthly |
| QA/QC compliance (standards, blanks, duplicates inserted and passing) Linked to fee | To be measured in diagnostic | ≥95% insertion and pass rate; zero unresolved database validation errors | Assay database QA/QC report, monthly |
| Rig standby/downtime hours | To be measured in diagnostic | −20% vs baseline | Contractor daily reports by delay code |
| Assay turnaround (sample dispatch to certificate) | To be measured in diagnostic | −15% vs baseline | Sample tracking log vs lab certificates |
| Community grievance closure within 30 days | No disclosed mechanism (baseline to be established) | ≥90% closed within 30 days; zero programme days lost to access disputes | Grievance register and drilling access log |
Why now and next steps
C3 is deploying fresh capital from the February 2026 raise across multiple drilling programmes in a new fiscal year that started Sept 1, 2026. Productivity habits set now determine how many metres, and how much news flow, the C$28M buys before the next financing. Data-governance and operability work done now also avoids expensive rework when Jasperoide moves toward a PEA.
- 1.30-minute call with Dan Symons to confirm current programme scope (Khaleesi, Super Block, Jamaica, Jasperoide) and the FY2027 budget.
- 2.Request the drilling contracts, three months of daily drill reports, and the assay/QA-QC summary under NDA.
- 3.Agree KPI definitions and the baseline measurement method for the diagnostic.
- 4.Sign the diagnostic SOW (US$40k fixed, cash) and mobilise to Peru within 2 weeks.
- 5.In parallel, the company's counsel confirms the TSXV route for the equity tranches.
Decision-makers
In suggested order of approach| Order | Person | What they care about | How to approach |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dan Symons President, CEO and Director ExecutiveHigh influence | Discovery news flow, metres drilled per dollar, runway, terms of the next raise, and the path to a Jasperoide PEA | Direct operator-to-operator email offering a US$40k diagnostic. Frame it as stretching the C$28M and making Jasperoide study-ready. In a junior, the CEO is the economic buyer, so ask him to bring in his VP Exploration / Peru country manager (not yet identified). |
| 2 | Tony Manini Chairman BoardHigh influence | Capital allocation discipline across four fronts, governance and data integrity ahead of NI 43-101 work | After CEO engagement, offer a short board briefing on the programme-productivity baseline and data-governance gaps (public inconsistencies). Position it as independent assurance. |
| 3 | Robert Gipson Reported ~15% shareholder (secondary source, unverified) ShareholderMedium influence | Value per dollar invested, limiting dilution, and milestone delivery | Only via or with management's consent: highlight the equity-aligned, KPI-vested fee and runway extension. Verify the holding first. |
| 4 | Paradigm Capital Lead underwriter of the Feb 2026 bought deal OtherLow influence | Successful follow-on financings and an investable milestone story | Indirect: an independent operability review of the Jasperoide assumptions strengthens the next-raise narrative. Use only as a sponsor reference. |
Stakeholder angles
Who else can push management to engageReportedly added C$4.25M in Feb 2026 [33], so he is directly exposed to how efficiently the raise is spent and to future dilution.
A 10% gain in field productivity is worth about C$0.66M a year: more metres and results per share issued. Our fee is 60% equity, vesting only on KPIs, so we are aligned with holders.
The board oversees allocation of C$28M across Khaleesi, Super Block, Jamaica and Jasperoide, and disclosure quality.
Independent operating baseline, KPI dashboard per programme and drill-data governance give the board line of sight on capital efficiency. They also reduce disclosure-consistency risk ahead of a PEA.
Co-funds and co-owns Super Block, which is a use of the 2026 proceeds [41].
Shared contractor scorecards and daily drilling KPIs give both JV parties transparent cost-per-metre and progress reporting.
Lead underwriter; the next financing's pricing depends on milestones and credibility.
Operator-reviewed Jasperoide mining and cost assumptions, plus a documented field-productivity record, give a more underwritable story for the next raise.
Management and board
2 people- Dan SymonsPresident, CEO and Director (per March 2026 presentation)
- Tony ManiniChairman (per March 2026 presentation)
Trigger events
Why now- 2026-02-12Financing
C$28.0M bought deal closed (25,455,000 shares at C$1.10). Capital is now being deployed on Khaleesi and Super Block drilling, so productivity and contractor discipline matter.[41]
- 2026-08-31Other
FY2026 year-end. FY2027 exploration budget and programme planning is underway, and audited FY2026 statements are expected around December 2026 (inferred from the Dec 11, 2025 FY2025 signing).[11]
- 2026-07-24Other
Q3 FY2026 results: net loss C$0.919M. Cash position partly disclosed.[45]
- 2026-06-12Financing
Hold period on bought-deal shares expired, so placement shares are now free-trading.[41]
- 2025-12Other
Khaleesi intercept of 269 m at 0.30% Cu plus Jamaica restart: a multi-jurisdiction programme expansion.[31]
Recent news
8- 2026-07-24C3 Metals reports Q3 FY2026: net loss C$0.919M (prior-year quarter C$1.09M); nine-month loss C$2.52M[45]
- 2026-03-23C3 Metals publishes March 2026 corporate presentation[13]
- 2026-03-09Secondary source reports Robert Gipson holds about 15% after buying C$4.25M of shares in Feb 2026 (unverified)[33]
- 2026-02-12C3 Metals closes C$28.0M bought deal (25,455,000 shares at C$1.10) to advance Khaleesi and Super Block[41]
- 2026-01-22Bought deal upsized to C$24.35M on demand; TSXV trading resumes[24]
- 2026-01-21TSXV halts trading pending news; C$20.0M bought deal announced[23]
- 2025-12Khaleesi project drilling returns 269 m at 0.30% Cu; Jamaica exploration restarting[31]
- 2025-02-27TSXV trading halt pending news; resumed Feb 28, 2025[26]